|
|
|
| Water Use |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Citywide Water Usage
2000-2007 |
|
Percentage: Local Vs Imported Water 1990-2007 |
|
Water Use by Sector as Percentage of Total Usage 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDICATOR |
Citywide Water Use, Percent Local vs. Imported & Potable vs. Non-potable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATUS |
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TREND |
Improving |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
 |
|
|
Sustainable
water consumption means using water no more
quickly than the rate at which it is restored.
As a city, Santa Monica could be completely
sustainable if it were able to supply all of its
water needs from local well sources
indefinitely. Reducing water consumption per
capita and increasing the percentage of water
that comes from local sources are two important
steps toward sustainability.
In order to
measure progress towards the stated goals, this
indicator looks at total citywide water use, the
percent of water that is local versus the
percent imported from distant watersheds in
California and the Western United States.
Finally, it examines the amount of water that is
potable versus non-potable.
The target
for consumption is to reduce overall water use
by 20% of 2000 levels by 2010. In 2000, water
use was 13.4 million gallons per day (MGD); a
twenty percent reduction of that usage is 10.7
MGD. The city aims to increase the amount of
locally obtained potable water to its 1995 high
point of 70% of total water use by the year
2010. The city is also working to maximize
non-potable water use when appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
|
 |
|
|
Citywide Water Consumption
This year the city saw a year-over-year drop in its
water usage for EVERY MONTH in the year. From 2006
to 2007, city water usage dropped 13.8 to 13.0
million gallons per day (MGD). That represents a
water usage drop of 6%.
Meeting the Indicator goal to reduce overall water
use by to 20% of the 2000 baseline (to 10.5 MGD) by
2010 continues to be a challenge, given continued
development and increasing daytime population.
Still this consistent drop during all seasons of the
year shows that the city’s water conservation
efforts are paying off.
Local vs. Imported Water
The percentage of local vs. imported water rose
between 2006 and 2007 from 12% to 13% of total water
supply. It is expected that this level will remain
steady until the remediation of the city’s wells
takes place over the next few years. See Analysis
below.
Potable Water Use
Santa Monica Urban Runoff & Recycling Facility (SMURRF)
produces non-potable water for use in landscape
irrigation, at city parks and cemeteries, toilet
flushing and in some city fountains. Sales of
recycled water from the SMURRF remained relatively
steady at 33 million gallons for all of 2007, nearly
1% of water use. For residents and businesses to
take further advantage of this reclaimed water
requires more infrastructure than is currently in
place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIGHLIGHTS |
|
|
|
|
●
The average American uses 168 gallons of water
per day. The average person in Santa Monica
uses 144 gallons of water per day.
●
The City of Santa Monica operates its own water
utility. Of the 13.0 million gallons used per
day, approximately 28% is consumed by
single-family units, 44% by multi-family units,
and 28% by commercial users. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
|
Citywide Water Use
The city is taking a leadership role in encouraging
innovative strategies to meet its 20% consumption
reduction goal, especially in outdoor water use.
This year, the city offered landscape grants for
Native Landscaping projects. The city continues to
support the residential water efficiency programs
the
"20 Gallon Challenge",
which encourages individuals to save 20 gallons of
water each day by implementing water saving
strategies for both indoor and outdoor water use.
The other ongoing programs are the Free Home Water
Assessments, Water Efficient Clothes Washer Rebate
Program, the High Efficiency Toilet Rebate Program,
and the Gardens & Landscaping Programs.
Local vs. Imported Water
In 1995, Santa Monica’s local groundwater wells most
of the water used in the city. I dropped
precipitously with the discovery in 1996 of the fuel
additive, MTBE, in our Charnock well field, the
result of leaking underground storage tanks. As a
result, the local water supply dropped from 70% in
1996, to a low of 5% in 2004. An agreement with the
responsible oil companies to provide for the
rehabilitation was reached in 2003. The relatively
low level of local water supply we see now is not
surprising, given that measures to rehabilitate the
affected wells have not yet been implemented.
Plans for the design of new treatment facilities to
restore the Charnock well field are well underway.
Great progress has been made in the last year,
including selection of an engineering firm to design
the needed treatment upgrades at the Charnock field
as well as improvements that will be needed at the
City’s main water treatment plant in West Los
Angeles. City staff is working with the selected
engineering firm on the design of the upgrades.
Construction is anticipated to begin in 2009 and is
expected to take about a year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT CAN WE DO TO IMPROVE? |
|
|
|
|
Ensure intra city compliance with
water regulations, while enforcing regulations for
water conservation in irrigation of residences and
businesses.
Check the
OSE website for tips on water conservation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATA SOURCES |
|
 |
|
|
View source material in Excel:
RC2_WaterUse.xls.
Email contact for data source inquires. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINTING TIPS
|
Printing tips for MS Internet Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAST UPDATED
|
November 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITATION |
www.smepd.org/scpr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|